The Virtual Entrepreneur

Bring Your Knowledge To The World

SEO or SNM

Posted by Neil Drori on August 10, 2009


Have We Put The Cart Before The Horse?

 

Online marketing efforts are like a store front or a trade show booth. They are effective only when they receive traffic. That brings us to the question of the day; for the small business working to build a recognized brand, how is traffic most effectively and cost efficiently generated?

 

 I’m not a web developer or an SEO expert but I am fairly tech savvy. Nevertheless, from time to time I find it useful to step away from the bells and whistles and establish a real world view for what will ultimately be a technology intensive project.

 

In the real world, the goal of every marketing project should be to engage the client. Engagement is the mechanism by which we establish relationships. Relationships build trust and through them, we come to understand what our clients need and how to serve them best.

 

Once this is accomplished, we can offer effective solutions and if we have built enough trust, conclude a sale. If we do this well enough and often enough we can bring about what I like to call the “Clairol Effect”; your client tells 2 friends and they tell 2 friends and so on and so on. This word of mouth form of marketing takes time and persistence. Most importantly, it takes adherence to the principle that your primary job is to satisfy your clients’ needs. It is without doubt, the single most effective method that I know of to grow your business.

 

In the world of virtual marketing however, the client centric approach seems to have lost its appeal. Articles like the one published by Entrepreneur Magazine in February, state emphatically that Search Engine Optimization is the first and best way to go. I’m not so sure.

 

SEO is the art of tweaking web sites from within their underlying code, from the outside through high profile back links and a hundred other things. The assumption is that search engine rankings are critical from a marketing perspective because most people use online search sites as a first stop when they are trying to find something on the web. Without SEO in place, we are left with the impression that we can never find an audience.

 

Articles like the one in Entrepreneur suggest to the small business operator that for internet marketing purposes, our attention needs to be focused not on our clients but on the search engines. We are told that we need to design our sites so they are “search engine friendly”. We need to establish relationships with other sites so that search engines can find us. What happened to being client friendly? Did the rules of marketing change so dramatically for the internet that only Google counts?

 

For the business faced with limited resources, I would like to suggest that Social Network Marketing is a better option. SNM falls back on the real world marketing principles I mentioned above. It takes advantage of the explosion in web based social networks and make it easier to come into contact with communities which share an interest in what we can bring to them. It gives us the opportunity to make contact with prospects on an individual basis and establish relationships. Using SNM we build trust by presenting our expertise through participation in the communities that make up our market.

 

From a technical perspective, the problem with SEO is that it’s an art but it presents itself as a science. The reason for this is that the Search business is intensely competitive. As a result the logic used by SEs to establish site rank is a closely held and constantly evolving secret. SEO professionals have to make their best guess as to what really works.

 

What bothers me about all of this is that SEO services are very rarely sold on this basis. After all, not many of us would buy a service if the provider told us that in offering their expertise, they could only provide us their best guess as to the outcome of our investment.

 

In addition, because SE algorithms (the logic used to rank pages) are constantly evolving, the SEO industry has generated a vast array of rules which they insist must be applied when designing and building sites.

 

In a recent Q&A on LinkedIn, a frustrated web developer illustrated just how difficult it can be to build attractive and content rich sites while living within the “known” SEO rules of engagement. The discussion generated 14 comments, an unusually high number and expressed points of view ranging from “if you don’t SEO the site you won’t have traffic” to “This is where I’ve had to stand firm in the clash between beauty and Search Engine Friendly”. Keep in mind; this is a discussion taking place in a back channel between professionals in the fields of web design and SEO! If they can’t figure it out, how can business people in other fields make intelligent decisions about using the technology? The worst consequence of all of this in my mind is that it opens the door for convincing hacks to sell their charms and rattles to the rest of us.

 

How this frenzy of attention to SEO impacts entrepreneurs is perhaps illustrated by a personal story.

 

A couple of weeks ago, I heard from a buddy who proudly announced that he hired an SEO “expert” a few months back and for only $500 a month he was promised page 1 on a Google search for a few selected keywords. He very proudly told me that after only 4 months, his web site had moved all the way up to the 3rd Google page.

 

In another LinkedIn discussion on this subject, a web marketing professional indicated the following “click through” rates for the top 5 positions on Google page one search results: P1=42% P2=12% P3=8.5% P4=6% P5=5%. If these numbers are correct, my buddy’s rise to page 3 had no impact at all to visitor traffic on his site.

 

The person in question is a very successful entrepreneur who is truly an expert in his field but he knows very little about internet marketing. His company’s web site has been refreshed recently but is not content heavy and is basically a static Web 1.0 catalog. His SEO “expert” has never even looked at the site! He never suggested adding dynamic content to engage his audience or adding a web form to capture leads. I don’t blame my buddy. He has his hands full in his own business. I do blame this SEO “expert” and the SEO industry in general for over-emphasizing manipulative over organic (read earned) rankings.

 

There’s a common problem here that seems to be impacting both the frustrated web designer and my buddy and it’s a direct result of the hyperactivity surrounding SEO. The problem is that we have stopped thinking about the client and we are instead focusing our attention on the search engines themselves.

 

The social media alternative comes in the form of social networks, blogs and web sites designed specifically to be engaging, informative and interactive for our target markets. SNM offers the small business operator a way to take their expertise to market with a limited budget, requiring only content rich and interactive web presence and a time investment. It is effective without the intervention of experts who may or may not have any real expertise and it can be managed and readily understood by the average business person.

 

Aside from providing us with direct channels to our target markets, social media is at least as good for generating referrals to our web sites as search engines. The resulting traffic has a better sense of what they might find when they get to our sites and they are ultimately better qualified leads who are more likely to be converted to clients.

 

I first ran into this point of view while researching my post about selecting domain names. In a blog post by Thomas Baekdal called Designing Future Web Sites Thomas offered statistics from his own blog to show how social networks had far and away become his most important source of referrals. He went on to say that he expects this trend to continue and to grow because ultimately people will tend to trust other people for reliable references more than they will trust search engines.

 

At the time I was doing this research, I was just starting my blog. Thomas’ contention made sense to me but I had no direct evidence. Since then I have been actively participating in social networks to better under the issues faced by my markets and my blog performance certainly supports his claim. My audience has grown far more than I would have expected and the rate of growth has surprised me. I have done nothing in the way of SEO. Of the hundreds of referrals I’ve received only 1 or 2 have come from search engines. In fact I can’t even find my blog on Google but I don’t really care as long as my audience finds value in what I have to say. The growth has been organic and to me that has far more value than any rush of unqualified visitors I might have generated by putting money into SEO.

 

 TVE page view stats_080909

 

At the end of the day, social network marketing is a form of virtual marketing which will fit into the limited budgets available to the entrepreneur. It can be understood and effectively directed by business operators who are not internet experts. It generates visitors who are interested and engaged in what is being offered and it is at least as effective but far more honest than the SEO alternative.

 

If you’re working with an unlimited marketing budget, there’s nothing wrong with finding a reputable SEO professional and making your site more search engine friendly as long as you don’t forget who your client is. But if your business is like most small businesses and you’re working on a shoestring, fall back on what you know works best in the real world and apply it to your virtual presence through social network marketing. That way you’ll be sure you’re not putting the cart before the horse.

 


9 Responses to “SEO or SNM”

  1. vonei said

    What a great article Neil! I always questioned how if everyone was doing the same things on SEO, and there were 1000 competitors for the same keywords, how would anyone benefit? It would be like saying to wear a red shirt to stand out in the crowd and then finding that everyone else was also wearing a red shirt. Your comment on not being on the front page of a search result is absolutely on the mark. Also, your advice on offering something of specific value so people will spread the word is an excellent one. I just added your blog link to mine on vonei.wordpress.com as I believe your insights are great to share with our audience. Keep up the interesting and helpful advice!

  2. Hi Neil,

    We met today on LinkedIn. You were right. I found this post very interesting. I guess if I have an opinion (and you know what they say about opinions) I think a combination of both approaches (SEO and SNM) is recommended. Good SEO can get you traffic fast and cheap but these are cold leads. SNM will generate warm leads or referral leads because there is already a relationship built or is in the process of being built. In the long run that will not change regardless of what the search engines do.

    This may seem very elementary but today on LinkedIn I got a comment from someone so I checked out his website: Wire Names because I was curious what he did. I immediately noticed several SEO no no’s on his home page. I wrote him back and told him about them with my advice. He was very thankful and said he will immediately implement my suggestions and he asked that I send him an invitation to join his network. I did and he did. I had never actually done that before and a light bulb went off and I thought, “wow I should do this every day”. What a great way to display expertise, build trust and network online! Who knows, maybe Dave will find he would like to hire us to assist him in his link building or website marketing efforts? Either way, I had fun doing it and found it rewarding to assist someone in their endeavors.

    Great post, it has me thinking now. It’s been an interesting day.

    - Chris

  3. “Did the rules of marketing change so dramatically for the internet that only Google counts?”

    Umm, Yup that is correct

    Google is the largest shopping center the world has ever seen
    Google is the maker and breaker of business competition

    “…a web marketing professional indicated the following “click through” rates for the top 5 positions on Google page one search results: P1=42% P2=12% P3=8.5% P4=6% P5=5%. If these numbers are correct, my buddy’s rise to page 3 had no impact at all to visitor traffic on his site.”

    Your buddies rise to page 3 did little for traffic I’m sure, rise to page one and I’m betting there would be a much different tale to talk about

    Fill the first page of the serps with your clients urls and their prospective customers would have no choice but to come to teh conclusion that “Google must think pretty highly of this company”

    top rankings don’t always have to result in traffic, a benefit of top rankings is credibility.

  4. SEO in my thinking is on-site optimization while SNM is part of off-site optimization. You actually need to optimize both, depending on your business and your market place. For a business in a specialty “niche” that draws from a nationwide audience Google placement is important. Social networking aids in Google placement by getting SERPs for articles, videos and blog comments that all point to you and your brand as “experts”. And it does lead to competition for certain long tail keywords. It is the strongest that survive. The same holds true for local branding where everyone is competing for their share of the pie.

    Michael

  5. A good article, but I would mention that the SEO practitioners you mention treat SEO as a tactic. If approached as a marketing discipline, encompassing knowledge of user needs, technical requirements, design considerations, promotional efforts, and marketing concerns – you get a program the will not only “capture” traffic but help with the process of converting traffic into leads and customers. I agree with you that a great deal of SEO is art, I call myself the “Search Artist” for that reason in part. However, as part of a discipline, there is much science as well.

  6. Andy C said

    Nice post Neil

    SEO, SNM, SEM and whatever acronym you want use it all comes down time, traffic and money. Your friend spent some money to get his site ranked better to get more traffic. Social networking comes down to time, it would be hard to spend very little time at it and be successful. Before a client ever gets a website from me we will go in great detail about how they will determine if the website has been a success. Generally success is achieved if “x” happens “x” number of times. Then you can talk about how much time and effort it will take to reach those goals. If the client doesn’t have the time, want to put forth the effort or pay somebody to do it for them then the website will fail.

    Taking a holistic approach from being to end is the answer. To blame a SEO
    guy for doing what he was paid to do is not far, just short sighted by both
    parties.

    Andy

  7. Nice Post!

    The information on this post was very interesting and relevant to the “non savvy” small business owner. As far as observations relating to the “average” business owner, there is simply not enough time to do this type of investigation. In concordance with Andy’s comment I would have to agree that outsourcing marketing is, if at all viable, very important. Interestingly, like every other business decision the task becomes who to trust with this technical marketing? I would have to say that perhaps the problem with this marketing enigma is that the target, when dealing with the internet, is intrinsically everyone?
    Keep reading if your business is ranked less than #1 on various search engine queries! If your market research is correct to begin with, when dealing with traditional advertisement choices (i.e. printed media, radio, tv) the question always boils down to: (as you clearly stated) of my target audience how many people can I reach. Thus, if a business owner is not able to create buzz via the traditional social networking channels or simply tech stupid, would ridding the coattails of larger companies with big ads be of value? Or is optimization the only other viable method?
    I think you make an excellent point in utilizing social networking sites by truncating marketing groups into manageable chunks. In a sense by focusing on these social groups you enclose a targeted audience within one area creating a Doppler Effect-where the more people taking about something the louder it gets in the room.

  8. [...] east on I80 – somewhere in Central Nebraska) My post about social network marketing a couple of weeks back, sparked a lot of comments on my blog and my social networks. One of the [...]

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>